UK High Court’s £3.4bn War Risk Insurance Ruling: A Landmark Moment for Aviation, Insurance, and Global Legal Strategy-

In one of the most consequential rulings of 2024 for the aviation and insurance sectors, the UK’s Commercial Court has handed down a landmark judgment directing war risk insurers to compensate major aircraft lessors for planes and engines stranded in Russia following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. With litigation valued at £3.4 billion, this decision reinforces the global relevance of UK courts in navigating complex geopolitical insurance disputes. 

The Crux of the Dispute 

At the heart of the case was the loss of 116 aircraft and 15 engines leased by Ireland’s AerCap—the world’s largest aviation lessor—and 22 aircraft claimed by Dubai Aerospace Enterprise (DAE). Following Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, these assets were effectively expropriated after being seized or retained within Russian borders under government restrictions. Lessors turned to their insurers, triggering war risk clauses in their policies. 

The ruling by Mr Justice Butcher mandates that war risk insurers—not general liability underwriters—must pay out under the applicable policies. For AerCap alone, this has secured £1.035 billion, making it one of the most significant war-related insurance recoveries in history. 

Legal Strategy, Insurance Principles, and Precedent 

AerCap was represented by Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer (HSFK), while DAE was represented by Clifford Chance. Both legal teams emphasized the global significance of the ruling. Fiona Treanor of HSFK underlined the importance of “robust insurance policies in contingency planning,” a sentiment echoed by Paul Lewis, who hailed the “huge responsibility” involved in managing such high-stakes claims. 

From a legal point of view, the judgment is a strong endorsement of the integrity of UK contractual enforcement mechanisms—even amid geopolitical chaos. Clifford Chance’s Julian Acratopulo called it a “reassuring outcome” for policyholders globally, adding that the seizure of aircraft by Russia was exactly the type of scenario these policies were designed to insure against. 

The court found that war risk insurance was indeed triggered by the events, dismissing insurers' arguments that their policies did not extend to the current situation. Notably, the judgment also confirmed that sanctions did not obstruct insurers from fulfilling their indemnity obligations—a crucial clarification for current and future claimants operating under similar geopolitical constraints. 

Industry Reactions and Limitations 

While the ruling has brought clarity, it is not without its critics. Aaron Le Marquer of Stewarts noted that the payout under war risk insurance is significantly lower than what could have been claimed under all-risks policies. This potentially leaves a substantial portion of AerCap’s losses unrecovered, and the door remains open for appeals or further litigation. 

In broader terms, the judgment is expected to influence parallel proceedings in Ireland and elsewhere. Ned Beale of Hausfeld pointed out that while the ruling will likely prompt further settlements, it does not preclude future claims under operator policies, which are still scheduled for trial in 2026. 

Wider Implications for Political Risk Insurance 

The importance of this case goes beyond aviation. Elaina Bailes from the London Solicitors Litigation Association emphasized that the legal principles established—particularly around asset loss tests and the enforceability of war-related insurance—will resonate across sectors reliant on political risk insurance. From logistics to energy, and especially in regions with high geopolitical volatility, this ruling will shape how insurance clauses are drafted, interpreted, and contested. 

This litigation also showcases the Commercial Court’s capacity to manage multi-party, high-value claims efficiently—something Bailes hailed as vital for London’s continued relevance as a global dispute resolution hub. 

Conclusion: A Legal Milestone with Global Ripples 

This judgment is not just a legal win for AerCap and DAE. It represents a rare moment where judicial clarity meets geopolitical complexity, setting a precedent for how war risk and political risk insurance claims might be interpreted worldwide. It also sends a clear message: UK courts remain committed to upholding contractual obligations, even in the face of unprecedented global disruption. 

As more claims from the Russia-Ukraine conflict and other geopolitical hotspots make their way to courtrooms, this decision may well serve as the benchmark for litigation strategy and policy interpretation for years to come. 

---

Follow LexTalk World for more news and updates from International Legal Industry.

---