REGULATION OF SPORTS BETTING IN BRAZIL: after the legal "back-and-forth" a sea of opportunities and risks emerges
- Laudenor Pereira Neto

- Jul 26
- 7 min read
Updated: Jul 30

The history of gambling and betting regulation in Brazil reflects the complex
interactions between social values, economic needs, and political arrangements
across different historical periods. From an almost absolute prohibition to a specific
authorization for “fixed-odds sports betting”, the legislative trajectory reveals
paradigm shifts and the State's adaptation to new realities and demands. Although
recent regulation has increased state revenue and created opportunities for various
entrepreneurs, it’s essential to remain mindful of the risks associated with this
activity, particularly considering the historical and legislative context in which
betting in Brazil is situated.
Historical and Legal Overview
The Brazilian Penal Code of 1890, enacted during the transitional period from
Empire to Republic, criminalized, under Article 369, the operation of "gambling
houses where people habitually gather, even if no admission fee is charged, to play
games of chance, or establishing them in a place frequented by the public". Article
370 defined "games of chance" as those whose gains and losses depend exclusively
on luck.
The criminalization of gambling in the period possibly reflects the influence
of republican moralism and the strong Catholic heritage in Brazil, which at the time
viewed gambling as a socially deviant practice. Besides the alleged concern for
maintaining social and moral order, the sole paragraph of Article 370 created an
exception to allow betting (at the time, gambling and betting were referred
indistinctly in Brazil) on foot or horse races and similar activities - demonstrating, on
a practical analysis, a selective application of the law favoring activities traditionally
associated with wealthier social groups.
Subsequently, amid economic restructuring and the need to foster strategic
sectors, the rigidity of the 1890 Penal Code concerning gambling was softened by
Law No. 3897 of 1920. Article 14 of this law permitted the temporary granting and
operation of games of chance (gamble), specifically in clubs and casinos located in
thermal and climate resort areas, under certain conditions. These conditions—
including prior licensing, prohibiting minors, and requiring formal management—
sought to channel gambling towards revenue generation and regional development
while maintaining monitoring, reflecting a continued ambivalence toward the
activity. Notably, no requirement for moral integrity or good reputation was imposed
on business administrators, revealing a still cautious approach.
With the end of the so-called "Golden Age" of casinos in Brazil, a new wave
of restriction came during the “Estado Novo” (New State) dictatorship. Law No. 3688 of 1941 (known as the Criminal Misdemeanors Law) criminalized in Article 50 the act of “establishing or operating a game of chance in a public place or one
accessible to the public, whether admission is charged or not.” According to
paragraph 3 of this article, a "game of chance" is one whose outcome depends
exclusively or primarily on luck; as well as any unauthorized bets on horse races or
any other sporting events. This prohibition was reinforced by Law No. 9215 of 1946,
which, even after Brazil’s return to democracy in the Populist Republic period,
banned the practice and exploitation of games of chance throughout the country.
During a subsequent military dictatorship, Decree-Law No. 204 of 1967
established a new framework for the operation of lotteries, positioning them as a
public service exclusively under federal jurisdiction and not subject to concession.
Accordingly, except for explicitly authorized lotteries, the operation of all other
games of chance remained prohibited, which was justified as a means of preventing
criminal exploitation and the diversion of public funds.
It is worth noting, however, that even after the reestablishment of the
democratic state in 1988, various laws were enacted to alternatively relax or tighten
gambling restrictions. For instance, Law No. 8672 of 1993 innovatively authorized,
under Article 57, sports governing bodies to operate bingo games or similar
activities as a funding mechanism. Similarly, Law No. 9615 of 1998 allowed these
sports administration and practice entities to run bingo games but banned gambling
machines or electronic amusements in bingo halls. Article 64 of this law also
prohibited operational authorizations based on mere indications of the
unfitness/unsuitability of sports entities, commercial companies, or their
managers.
However, due to the proliferation of bingo halls and their alleged association
to illegal activities, including money laundering, tax evasion, and organized crime,
Law No. 9981 of 2000 was then enacted to re-criminalize bingo, making it once again an illicit activity under Article 50 of the Law of Misdemeanors. After significant
pressure from economic actors, political interests, and the rise of an informal and
increasingly lucrative betting market, both domestically and abroad, Law No. 13756
of 2018 was enacted to legalize “fixed-odds sports betting”, reflecting the digital and
globalized context of the modern gambling/betting industry.
Nevertheless, as the law lacked detailed regulatory criteria, exposing the
sector to traditional criminal risks such as money laundering and tax evasion, Law
No. 14790 of 2023, popularly known as the "Bets Law", was finally introduced to
regulate this highly profitable and somewhat risky sector that had already been
operating for several years.
Fixed-Odds Sports Betting: Key Concepts and Requirements
Although Law No. 14790/2023 regulates exclusively “fixed-odds sports betting”,
it is evident that it aims to bring Brazil closer to international models in the matter,
such as those of United Kingdom, Germany, and France. For better understanding,
it is useful to highlight some of the main definitions set forth in Article 2 of the law,
especially because the conduct generally known as mere “gamble” is still prohibited:
Betting: the act of risking a certain amount of money in expectation of a prize.
Fixed-odds: the multiplier factor of the wagered amount that determines the
payout, per unit of currency bet, in case of a win.
Real sports-themed event: an event, competition, or act including sports
tournaments, games, or trials, either individual or team-based, whose
outcome is unknown at the time the bet is placed and which is promoted or
organized.
Online game: the digital medium enabling virtual betting on games where
the outcome is determined by the result of a future random event, using a
random number, symbol, figure, or object generator as defined by the rules.
Virtual online game event: a digital event or competition whose result is
unknown at the time the bet is placed.
The scope of the law is limited to real sports-themed events and virtual online
gaming events. It explicitly prohibits betting on youth categories or events involving
only underage athletes, as well as the installation of physical equipment or
terminals intended to facilitate online “fixed-odds betting” in public
establishments.
To operate in Brazil, betting agents must be legal entities headquartered and
managed in Brazil, under Brazilian law and subject to authorization from the Ministry of Finance. Foreign partners may be involved, provided there is at least one Brazilian partner holding a minimum of 20% of the share capital. Article 26 also sets out a non-exhaustive list of individuals prohibited from placing bets, such as coaches, athletes, and referees, to preserve sporting integrity, with potential expansion by the regulatory authority.
The requirements for obtaining authorization are strict and generally include
proof of lawful origin of funds; suitability of legal representatives, partners, ultimate
beneficial owners, and strategic position holders; implementation of anti-money
laundering and counter-terrorism financing policies, as well as corporate
governance, "know your customer" procedures, monitoring of suspicious activities,
customer support services, continuous training programs for employees, user
awareness campaigns on responsible gambling, and measures against match
fixing and betting addiction.
The license fee is R$30 million and covers up to three brands for a five-year
period. Additionally, operators must deposit R$5 million in a secured account to
safeguard prize payments. From a tax perspective, a 12% rate applies to the
operator’s Gross Gaming Revenue - calculated as betting revenue minus prize
payouts and income tax withheld from winnings - and a 15% Income Tax is applied
to the net gains of the individual bettor.
In addition to the requirements provided by Law No. 14790/2023, operators
must comply with various regulations issued by the Secretariat of Prizes and Betting
(SPA), a branch from the Ministry of Finance, which is responsible for authorizing,
granting, regulating, monitoring, supervising, and sanctioning activities in the
sector. These regulations cover a wide range of issues, including bettor rights and
obligations, payment transaction rules, internal controls, and lists of eligible sports
and entities for betting.
Risks and Challenges
Despite its economic potential, the legalization of sports betting raises
concerns regarding not only pathological betting/gambling disorders but also
serious criminal threats. The ease of online transactions, the large volume of money
involved, and the global nature of the activity can attract both vulnerable individuals
and sophisticated criminal schemes, particularly those involved in money
laundering, thus requiring rigorous monitoring by both operators and regulators.
A growing concern is match-fixing, particularly in the context of betting on
secondary events (e.g., who will receive the first yellow card or which team will win
the first corner kick), which raises doubts about the legitimacy of a match outcome
and gives space for frauds. These bets increase the complexity of monitoring, as
they are more susceptible to manipulation, making enforcement efforts more
difficult. Ensuring sporting integrity is therefore a regulatory cornerstone,
demanding not only control policies but also coordinated actions between
operators and national and international monitoring entities.
In this context, the main criminal risks regarding sports betting in Brazil
include the use of betting platforms for money laundering (under Article 1 of Law
No. 9613/1998) and tax evasion (under Articles 1, 2, and 7 of Law No. 8137/1990).
Article 25 of the Bets Law explicitly states that operators must both monitor
suspicious activities and report them to the Financial Activities Control Council
(COAF), Brazil’s financial intelligence unit, indicating that the directors have a duty
to act.
Unsurprisingly, following the enactment of the Bets Law, several police
operations have been launched to combat unlawful activities involving match
fixing, money laundering, and tax evasion. These include operations such as “Jogo
Limpo” (“Fair Play”), “VAR” (Video Assistant Referee), “Spot-Fixing” and
“Integration”. Such investigations highlight the ongoing need for robust oversight to
prevent the distortion of both sports betting and sports themselves.
But not only. Given the complexity of operations and the broad array of
criminal offenses outlined in Brazilian law, certain behaviors may also constitute
sports fraud (Article 200, Law No. 14597/2023), in a hypothesis of match-fixing, or
the misdemeanor offense of operating illegal games of chance (Article 50, Decree
Law No. 3688/1941), such as when betting occurs in violation of legal requirements.
The involvement of minors may also lead to violations of Articles 243 and 244-B of
Law No. 8069/1990 (Statute of the Child and Adolescent), or even false or
misleading advertising offenses under Articles 66, 67, or 68 of Law No. 8078/1990
(Consumer Protection Code), particularly if advertisements mislead consumers or
fail to comply with statutory standards.
Conclusion
The historical and legislative evolution of gambling and betting in Brazil
reveals a legal landscape marked by ongoing adaptation to shifting social and
economic realities. From moralistic prohibition to selective authorizations and
subsequent reversals, the country has now reached a stage of specific legalization
and regulation of “fixed-odds sports betting”. This most recent phase prioritizes the
formalization and control of an already existing market, aiming to generate tax
revenue, protect consumers, prevent match-fixing, and deter the use of the sector
for criminal purposes.

Comments